SGW to Femoral triangle - Synthetic vs "autogenous"

[Ronald Gross]

Ken,
While the leg might be viable, is it or might it still be FUNCTIONAL. 
As I try to envision the destruction to the groin and upper thigh as
described, a wonder if there will be any FUNCTION or if he will instead
be dragging a viable, non-functional appendage, much as a sailboat would
drag her anchor in a storm.......
My guess is, knowing Dr. Mattox, that the leg will not be functional,
and the debate now raging is more (understandably) emotional than
ethical, or scientific.  
Amputation now will enable emotional and physical rehab in the very near
future.  Delay, with months of futile surgical heroism will delay and
perhaps eliminate eventual emotional rehab, regardless of the physical
outcome.
I will shut up now.
Ron

>>> <KMATTOX at aol.com> 08/08/06 3:25 PM >>>
 
In a message dated 8/8/2006 1:45:34 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
sohailmuzammil at hotmail.com writes:

The time  has come to counsel the patient and
amputate (or ablate as Dr. Mattox puts  it).

Regards
S Muzammil, FRCS



This suggestion was also mentioned in our group, by me.   It has  caused
a 
great deal of ethical, moral, and scientific polarization.    The leg is
still 
viable.   The man is a construction worker and wants  to keep his leg.  

 
k
--
trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://www.trauma.org/traumalist.html