Consesnt vs. Responsibility;
Krin135 at aol.com
Krin135 at aol.com
Sat Nov 4 21:14:15 GMT 2006
In a message dated 11/4/2006 1:05:47 PM Central Standard Time,
tangentcarrot at hotmail.com writes:
The first dillema is- should EMS personnel (EMT-B'S, in this case) insist
with such pateints? I tried conviencing them to "talk some sense" into him,
but they refused,despite my description of coma and amnesia, saying they
couldn't force him and that "he looks fine now", and left the scene.
Problem being that he's now upright and relatively coherent...while he is
displaying the classic 'lucid interval' that may presage an expanding epidural
bleed, there's nothing that you can do for him right now...
Once he passes out, at least here in the US and Canada, 'implied consent'
becomes possible, and further treatment can be rendered.
ck
Charles S. Krin, DO FAAFP
More information about the trauma-list
mailing list