[ccm-l] disaster managemant policies
Dain, Catherine
dainc at KGH.KARI.NET
Thu Apr 19 16:13:58 BST 2007
You're so correct, Dr. Mattox.
Having been directly, right smack in the middle of SARS at NYGH in '03,
it was a horror to be doing the planning during that type of situation.
We already had a disaster plan for things like accidents etc, and it
required lots of people to get it going, lots of education, "races" to
get even the gear on properly. The gear itself..tents, all that, take up
a lot of space in a hospital and require a big space, and someone to
take care of it all. We have a CBRN team. We teach staff, physicians in
our area fairly regularly, and have practice ourselves to get into the
equipment, put up the tent. All this, I'd say from experience, plans for
about 70% of the disaster. The other 30% comes from the little things
locally..ie, quaratined staff.. How do they eat, go to the washroom and
where, staff to take over in the equipment/masks, because no one should
be in those more than 60-90 minutes. I agree with learning from others'
pitfalls and difficulties.
Here in Ontario/Canada, our hearts go out to you and we are thinking of
all of you during this horrible time at VT. It affects us all. Our
sympathies.
cathy
-----Original Message-----
From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org
[mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org] On Behalf Of KMATTOX at aol.com
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 11:04
To: hammond at umdnj.edu; ladybear_4me at yahoo.com; ccm-l at ccm-l.org
Cc: trauma-list at trauma.org
Subject: Re: [ccm-l] disaster managemant policies
In a message dated 4/19/2007 5:53:34 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
hammond at umdnj.edu writes:
Writing or updating a disaster plan is not:
a) something that should be undertaken by just 2 people or
b) something readily achieved by adopting off-the-shelf material.
Some templates exist (e.g. JCAHO, ANA, etc) but they just offer a place
to begin. In the long run they have limited utility. I would start by
doing a lot of reading (learn from others' pitfalls) and talking
(interview others who have thought this through). It will take
considerable time.
Hold a bona fide drill/exercise and look critically at your flaws and
warts.
Do a thorough institutional HVA (hazard vulnerability analysis) to guide
your process.
If you are part of a health network your plan should be coordinated with
your partners.
K Mattox responds:
I find Dr. Hammond's suggestions very insightful. We in health care
see
disaster planning and response totally differently from those in EOCs
and
Unified Command governmental and public health structures. We in
trauma and
critical care focus on the small number of patients with acute clinical
problems,
but the public health and governmental infrastructure (spell that
silos)
focuses on many broader issues of sheltering, evacuation, feeding,
clothing,
security, relocation, etc. The most successful disaster structures
recognize, respect and integrate the talents of ALL of the local
community resources,
and have a plan to ask for and utilize regional, state, and even
federal or
military resources if needed.
>From a clinical standpoint, most acute disaster response occurs within
the
first 48 hours, and ALL such resources are LOCAL. Whatever your
status,
learn the incident command structures in your local area and work
towards
integrating all of those into one integrated collaborative network.
In most countries of the world, the mandate for disaster planning and
response for a catchment of people rests with LOCAL GOVERNMENT. This
mandate is
by law in most cities, states, and countries of the world. The EMS
availability and response are also assumed to be governed by the LOCAL
governmental
incident command, which usually does NOT have an active clinical person
in
this EOC. The medical personnel in the EOC are most frequently public
health
persons. The hospital, trauma center, etc. care for patients they
receive,
often without knowledge of the regional problem, regional dispatch and
dispersion, and EOC command decisions.
Thus, in many communities, the trauma system, the hospitals, the EMS, in
their immediacy of response become SILOs of their own.
We are quite prepared for disasters in terms of federal organizations,
state
organizations, policies, and local EOC web sites. We actually have
almost
twice the number of independently operating silos than we had
per-Katrina.
In my humble observation, there is LESS integration of these silos than
BEFORE Katrina.
We have a complex of Local vs State vs Federal vs EMS vs Public Health
vs
Hospital vs Trauma Center vs Volunteer organization need for corporate
and
individual recognition. It is assumed that organizations, especially
nationally named funding or policy organizations (NDMS, FEMA, ACS,
ACEP, DMAT, HRSA,
etc. etc. ) have made recommendations and decisions based on evidence
based
medicine principles. NOT. Just look for data to support some of the
gadgets
recommended to be present in the hospital, EMS and trauma centers.
Total
non standardization and differences in recommendation among agencies,
with
open questions as to whether or not industry has made some of the
recommendations for grants, based on sales potential.
Organizations are positioning themselves to be in "control" of evacuee
distribution and assignment, not fully understanding trauma, infections
disease,
chemical, burn, radiation capacity evaluation and treatment of health
care
facilities. During Rita, some hospitals lost their ability to care
for REAL
emergency patients because they became a SHELTER for special needs
evacuees
(with the needs not being medical). Such special needs evacuees do
need
sheltering and evaluation and support, but NOT at an understaffed,
overcrowded
regional Trauma, Heart, Infections Disease, Burn (etc.) resource.
Jeff Hammond is now capably leading the ACS COT Disaster Subcommittee
and I
am sure we can see new directions and policies which will help us all
integrate our capabilities and resources
k
************************************** See what's free at
http://www.aol.com.
--
trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
More information about the trauma-list
mailing list