BIG NEWS - CT Causes Leukemia ?
Robert F. Smith
rfsmithmd at comcast.net
Fri Nov 30 21:20:41 GMT 2007
Also there's the BEIR (Biologic Effects of Ionizing Radiation) report which
is updated every couple of years. That has all sorts of information about
this.
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org [mailto:trauma-list-bounces at trauma.org]
On Behalf Of caesar ursic
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 12:28 PM
To: Trauma &, Critical Care mailing list
Subject: Re: BIG NEWS - CT Causes Leukemia ?
I've just logged off PubMed where I was a bit overwhelmed by all the
literature on the matter. Additionally, it's interesting to read (abstracts
only, so far) the conflicting studies on whether or not to even re-scan the
injured spleen in the asymptomatic patient. Scalea and co. say 'don't
nother.' Others advocate it even for grade I injuries. Clearly there is no
consensus.
Will this parallel the "steroids in spinal cord injury' dilemma (some would
say hysteria) from the early 90's?
CM Ursic
Santa Fe, NM, USA
On 11/30/07, kmattox at aol.com <kmattox at aol.com> wrote:
>
> Caesar. Not just this one article. There are now about six articles.
> In addition there is an extensive review on the internet. Do a google
> search for Radiation Risks from CT scans and be prepared for 8 hours of
> reading from all of your secondary searches and surfing.
>
> K
>
>
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "caesar ursic" <cmursic at gmail.com>
>
> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:26:05
> To:"Trauma &, Critical Care mailing list" <trauma-list at trauma.org>
> Subject: Re: BIG NEWS - CT Causes Leukemia ?
>
>
> Normally I make them wait four-six months if the interval scan shows no
> problems, depending on the severity of the original injury and what I
> perceive to be the patient's proclivity to common sense, reason and self
> restraint. In these two cases where such scan will (likely) *not* be
> forthcoming, I am going to tell them that I *cannot* in good conscience
> write them such a letter, and that they will just need to decide on their
> own if and when they will allow their son to resume contact sports and
> other
> high risk activities (it's starting to snow here, and the skis and
> snowboards are getting restless). Curious about what the rest of you
> would
> do in my situation.
>
> And now I'm off to the library to find that NEJM article. I get the
> feeling
> that this will be a recurring matter.
>
> CM Ursic
> Santa Fe, NM, USA
>
>
>
> On 11/30/07, William Bromberg <brombwi1 at memorialhealth.com> wrote:
>
> > Caesar - so when are you going to allow the return?
> >
> > Did you think I'd let THAT one go?
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> --
> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
> http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
>
> --
> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
> http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
>
--
'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.
--
trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
More information about the trauma-list
mailing list