Ideal length of stay in the ED
Ronald Gross
Rgross at harthosp.org
Mon Oct 15 17:01:54 BST 2007
WAIT!!! I have a novel concept! Never been done before!
Are y'all ready????
Why don't we teach the residents to come to the ED, take a history, do a physical examination, and admit the patient based on all of that?? I think that really beats "Call me when the CT is done", and my guess is that the patient would be moved out of the ED and on to the floor about 4 to 5 hours sooner.
WOW. I think I am on to something novel. We might want to do a study or something........
Y'know, sometimes I really crack myself up!
My best to all,
Ron
>>> <Krin135 at aol.com> 10/15/2007 11:52 AM >>>
In a message dated 14-Oct-07 10:35:16 Central Daylight Time, KMATTOX at aol.com
writes:
In a message dated 10/14/2007 9:57:26 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
andrewj.bowman at gmail.com writes:
What then do we do about the attendings (fill in specialty here) who are
reluctant to admit a patient without the complete workup????
Create a hospital policy that allows, encourages, mandates that the EC
staff
have the authority, and supported by the Medical Executive Committee to
admit a patient to any hospital in-service where the service is slow to
evaluate
the patient or require that an entire work up occur there prior to going to
an
in house bed.
k
I'd love it...now just need to convince the med exec committee (and the
hospitalists) that the hospitalists and attendings don't need every jot and
tittle done in the ED prior to admission....
and convince some of the residents at major teaching hospitals that they can
finish the work up faster after they have the patient in their hands than
the smaller hospitals can do prior to transfer...
ck
Charles S. Krin, DO FAAFP
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
--
trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG
To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/
More information about the trauma-list
mailing list