2D or 3D TEEin penetrating cardiac injury

[IVAN HRONEK]

Matt,
 
obviously, you know 2D TEE is best, and now 3D TEE is becoming available.
We recently found a small pericardial effusion in a GSW to L chest - 
I advised to watch the patient as the etiology of the effusion obviously at that one instance of examination wasn't clear.
As you know acute pericardial tamponade can happen even with small volumes of effusion as the peridcardium hasn't been "stretched" by a slowly accumulating effusion.
 
What are people's experiences with tamponade - I am sure there are millions of horrendous stories....
 
Anybody has a better way than just watching the patient  ?
Ivan Hronek MDChief, Critical Care & Trauma AnesthesiaSFMC Gas, Inc.



> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 19:35:45 +0100> From: mgreeds at reeds.uk.com> To: trauma-list at trauma.org> Subject: ECG in penetrating cardiac injury> > Sa'ad,> > I once questioned the role of ECGs in demonstrating penentrating cardiac > injury. Unfortunately, I never got round to conducting a full review of > the literature but I have cited a few articles below which I > provisionally found some time ago.> > I am not aware of any significantly powered and properly conducted > studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of ECGs (I would nevertheless be > keen to hear from others on the list who have any enlightening data > either way.) My belief is that it does not have any real role as there > have been a number of penetrating cardiac injuries documented which do > not demonstrate any ECG changes and would have been missed if relied upon > as a single diagnostic test.> > > Absence of hemodynamic and ECG changes in a patient with traumatic left > ventricular injury and puncture of the left anterior descending branch. > Südkamp M, Geissler HJ, de Vivie ER. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Dec;48> (6):373-5.> > Penetrating cardiac trauma: follow-up study including > electrocardiography, echocardiography, and functional test. Duque HA, > Florez LE, Moreno A, Jurado H, Jaramillo CJ, Restrepo MC. World J Surg. > 1999 Dec;23(12):1254-7. (About post-operative monitoring NOT diagnostics)> > Dysrhythymia from an intrapericardial air gun pellet: a case report. > Willemsen P, Kuo J, Azzu A. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1996;10(6):461-2. > (Anecdotal case.)> > > The literature mostly refers to echocardiography being a much more useful > test (greater sensitivity and specificity.) Although the last publication > above refers to ECG changes being better at diagnosing penetrating > cardiac injury in that particular case than echocardiography.> > I feel that nothing can compare to appropriate histroy, examination of > the patient, mechanism of injury (e.g. knife stab wound to anterior chest > = high probability of cardiac injury until proved otherwised etc.) and > echo/FAST etc. are more appropriate in making a proper diagnosis.> > > Matthew> > --> trauma-list : TRAUMA.ORG> To change your settings or unsubscribe visit:> http://www.trauma.org/index.php?/community/